COMPARISON OF INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING AND PLATING IN TIBIAL FRACTURES: IMPACT ON MOBILITY RECOVERY

Authors

  • Syed Abdullah Qasim Ayub teaching hospital
  • Syed Qasim Mehmood Shah Department of Orthopedics, Jinnah Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Saim Khan Khattak Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Syeda Duaa Qasim Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Basharat Department of Orthopedics, Jinnah Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Rifat Latif Department of Anesthesia, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v22i3.1934

Keywords:

Early mobilization, Intramedullary nailing, Plating, Tibial shaft fracture, Weight‑bearing

Abstract

Background: Tibial shaft fractures are common and often require surgical fixation. This study compared intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plating for early postoperative mobility. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 480 adults with closed diaphyseal tibial fractures (240 IMN, 240 plating). Physiotherapy notes documented the first day of active knee/ankle mobilization. Outpatient visits provided data on time to partial and full weight-bearing. For comparison between groups t-test was used and p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Time to joint mobilization was significantly shorter with IMN (3.0±1.60 days) than plating (6.0±1.55 days), with a mean difference of -3.0 days (95% CI: -3.28 to -2.72; p<0.0001). Times to partial (6.68 vs 6.73 weeks; mean difference -0.05, 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.21; p=0.707) and full weight-bearing (8.57 vs 8.45 weeks; mean difference 0.12, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.39; p=0.389) were not significantly different. Conclusion: IMN allows significantly earlier joint mobilization than plating. As weight-bearing timelines were similar, IMN is preferred when early motion is a priority.

Pak J Physiol 2026;22(3):121-4, DOI: https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v22i3.1934

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury 2006;37(8):691–7.

Wu AM, Bisignano C, James SL, Abady GG, Abedi A, Abu-Gharbieh E, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of bone fractures in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev 2021;2(9):e580–92.

Hiesterman TG, Shafiq BX, Cole PA. Intramedullary Nailing of Extra-articular Proximal Tibia Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19(11):690–700.

Liu H, Xu W, Xiong Y, Zhang J, Xu Z, Wu J. Retrograde tibial intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive locking plate for extra-articular distal tibial fractures: a comparative and retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res 2024;19(1):481.

Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J. The epidemiology of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77(3):417–21.

Busse JW, Morton E, Lacchetti C, Guyatt GH, Bhandari M. Current management of tibial shaft fractures: a survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons. Acta Orthop 2008;79(5):689–94.

Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Tornetta P III, (Eds). Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019.

Cheung G, Zalzal P, Bhandari M, Spelt JK, Papini M. Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading. Med Eng Phys 2004;26(2):93–108.

Seyhan M, Unay K, Sener N. Intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous locked plating of distal extra-articular tibial fractures: a retrospective study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2013;23(5):595–601.

Kuhn S, Appelmann P, Pairon P, Mehler D, Hartmann F, Rommens PM. A new angle stable nailing concept for the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop 2014;38(6):1255–60.

Janssen KW, Biert J, van Kampen A. Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail: a retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. Int Orthop 2006;31(5):709–14.

Kwok CS, Crossman PT, Loizou CL. Plate versus nail for distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2014;28(9):542–8.

Anandasivam NS, Russo GS, Swallow MS, Basques BA, Samuel AM, Ondeck NT, et al. Tibial shaft fracture: A large-scale study defining the injured population and associated injuries. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2017;8(3):225–31.

Larsen P, Elsoe R, Hansen SH, Graven-Nielsen T, Laessoe U, Rasmussen S. Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. Injury 2015;46(4):746–50.

Grecco MAS, do Prado I Jr, Rocha MA, de Barros JW. Epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. Acta Ortop Bras 2002;10(4):10–7.

Madadi F, Farahmandi M, Eajazi A, Besheli L, Madadi F, Nasri Lari MN. Epidemiology of adult tibial shaft fractures: a 7-year study in a major referral orthopedic center in Iran. Med Sci Monit 2010;16(5):217–21.

Bahari S, Lenehan B, Khan H, McElwain JP. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation of distal tibia fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 2007;73(5):635–40.

Amin MQ, Ahmed A, Imran M, Ahmed N, Javed S, Aziz A. Tibial shaft fractures; Epidemiology, a 5-year study in Ghurki trust teaching hospital, Pakistan. Professioal Med J 2017;24(1):75–81.

Soni K, Patel J. Comparative study of distal tibia fractures managed by nailing vs plating. Nat J Clin Orthop 2018;2:106–12.

Sharda PN, Tailor JB, Mishra SK. Comparative study of intramedullary nailing versus plating in distal tibia fractures. Int J Med Pharm Res 2026;7:2930–6.

Ekman E, Lehtimäki K, Syvänen J, Saltychev M. Comparison between nailing and plating in the treatment of distal tibial fractures: A meta-analysis. Scand J Surg 2021;110(2):115–22.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2026

How to Cite

1.
Qasim SA, Shah SQM, Khattak SK, Syeda DQ, Basharat M, Latif R. COMPARISON OF INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING AND PLATING IN TIBIAL FRACTURES: IMPACT ON MOBILITY RECOVERY. Pak J Phsyiol [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 30 [cited 2026 Oct. 2];22(3):121-4. Available from: https://pjp.pps.org.pk/index.php/PJP/article/view/1934