ROLE OF β-2 GLYCOPROTEIN 1, ANTI-CARDIOLIPIN AND LUPUS ANTICOAGULANT ANTIBODIES IN DIAGNOSIS OF ANTI-PHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME

Authors

  • Humaira Ali Department of Chemical Pathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Erum Salim Department of Chemical Pathology, Dr. Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Tahira Perveen Department of Rheumatology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Shazia Naureen Department of Chemical Pathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Junaid Mahmood Alam Department of Chemical Pathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Syeda Rida e Zehra Department of Rheumatology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v22i2.1907

Keywords:

Anti-cardiolipin, Anti-phospholipid syndrome, Lupus anticoagulant antibodies, β2 glycoprotein 1

Abstract

Background: Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease in which the patient is in a hypercoagulable state leading to vascular thrombosis and obstetric morbidity and mortality. The aim of my study is to see the presence of Anti-β2 Glycoprotein 1 (Anti-β2GP1), Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant antibodies (LA) in patients suspected of APS. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed in the Department of Chemical Pathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi. A total of 115 patients from Rheumatology and Gynaecology Departments having thrombotic episodes were tested for the presence of one or more of the antibodies namely, Anti-β2GP1, Anti-Cardiolipin and Lupus Anticoagulant Antibodies in their sera. Data was analysed using SPSS-27. Results: Among 115 patients, 53.9% had no antibody positive and were considered to be disease free. Positivity with LA was seen in 23.5% of the population while 15.7% were positive with aCL IgM and 13% positive with aCL IgG. As regards Anti-β2GP1 IgM 8.7% and IgG 15.7% were positive in each assay. All parameters had low sensitivity but high specificity and negative predictive value. The diagnostic accuracy of aCL IgG and IgM was 77.3% and 74.7% respectively. Conclusion: Anti-β2GP1, aCL, and LA are valuable markers for the diagnosis of APS. They are better markers having a high specificity and negative predictive value.

Pak J Physiol 2026;22(2):83–5,  DOI: https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v22i2.1907

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arreola-Diaz R, Majluf-Cruz A, Sanchez-Torres LE, Hernandez-Juarez J. The pathophysiology of the antiphospholipid syndrome: A Perspective from the blood coagulation system. Clin Appl Thromb. 2022;28:10760296221088576.

Saadia A, Khan SH, Khan MD. Familial clustering of antiphospholipid syndrome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2019;29(12):1221–4.

Knight JS, Kanthi Y. Mechanisms of immunothrombosis and vasculopathy in antiphospholipid syndrome. Semin Immunopathol 2022;44(3):347–62.

O’Leary RE, Hsiao JL, Worswick SD. Antiphospholipid syndrome in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Cutis 2017;99(3):E21–4.

Marziale A, Bettacchioli E, Picart G, Nafai S, Galinat H, Meroni PL, et al. Antiphospholipid autoantibody detection is important in all patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. J Autoimmun 2020;115:102524.

Melayah S, Changuel M, Mankaï A, Ghedira I. IgA is the predominant isotype of anti‐β2 glycoprotein I antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Lab Anal 2020;34(6):e23217.

Lim W. Antiphospholipid syndrome. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2013;2013:675–80.

Naru T, Khurshid M, Nazir Z. Maternal and fetal complications of antiphospholipid syndrome: a case report with long-term follow-up. J Pak Med Assoc 2006;56(2):84–6.

Barbhaiya M, Zuily S, Naden R, Hendry A, Manneville F, Amigo MC, et al. The 2023 ACR / EULAR Antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria. Arthritis Rheumatol 2023;75(10):1687–702.

Bustamante JG, Goyal A, Rout P, Singhal M. Antiphospholipid Syndrome. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 24]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430980/

McDonnell T, Wincup C, Buchholz I, Pericleous C, Giles I, Ripoll V, et al. The role of beta-2-glycoprotein I in health and disease associating structure with function: More than just APS. Blood Rev 2020;39:100610.

De Groot PG, Urbanus RT. The significance of autoantibodies against β2-glycoprotein I. Blood 2012;120(2):266–74.

Jafry NH, Mubarak M, Ahmed E, Akhtar F. Catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome as a first manifestation of primary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in a middle-aged man. CEN Case Rep 2020;9(2):152–8.

Mushtaq MZ, Ahsan Ali S, Sattar Z, Mahmood SBZ, Amber T, Riaz M. A retrospective review of antiphospholipid syndrome from a South Asian country. Arch Rheumatol 2022;37(1):31–9.

Siniscalchi C, Basaglia M, Riva M, Meschi M, Meschi T, Castaldo G, et al. Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: A Review. Immuno 2023;4(1):1–13.

Keeling D, Mackie I, Moore GW, Greer IA, Greaves M, British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines on the investigation and management of antiphospholipid syndrome. Br J Haematol 2012;157(1):47–58.

Knight JS, Branch DW, Ortel TL. Antiphospholipid syndrome: advances in diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management. BMJ 2023;e069717.

Díaz-Coronado JC, Herrera-Uribe S, Hernández-Parra D, Betancur-Vásquez L, Lacouture-Fierro J, González-Hurtado D, et al. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS): Clinical and immunoserological differences between primary and secondary APS in a Colombian cohort. Rev Colomb Reumatol (English Ed.) 2021;28(3):191–6.

Vandevelde A, Devreese KMJ. Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights and Hindrances. J Clin Med 2022;11(8):2164.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

1.
Ali H, Erum Salim, Tahira Perveen, Shazia Naureen, Junaid Mahmood Alam, Syeda Rida e Zehra. ROLE OF β-2 GLYCOPROTEIN 1, ANTI-CARDIOLIPIN AND LUPUS ANTICOAGULANT ANTIBODIES IN DIAGNOSIS OF ANTI-PHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME. Pak J Phsyiol [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Jul. 2];22(2):83-5. Available from: https://pjp.pps.org.pk/index.php/PJP/article/view/1907