EFFECTIVENESS OF ANATOMICAL DISSECTION TABLE VERSUS TRADITIONAL ANATOMICAL MODELS IN STUDENTS OF GOMAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, DI KHAN

Authors

  • Shehla Aman Department of Anatomy, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Hassan Student, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
  • Mutaal Azeem Student, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
  • Faizullah Kundi Student, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
  • Jibran Zaman Student, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
  • Huzaifa Zahid Student, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Aimal Miankhel student gomal medical college
  • Shayr Ali Khan Student, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
  • Hassan Gul Student, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
  • Shabab Rabbani Student, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v21i4.1865

Keywords:

Please require an urgent publication

Abstract

Background: Very few studies have been conducted comparing the effectiveness of students for anatomical dissection table learning and traditional model based learning. In this study a direct comparison of anatomical dissection table learning and traditional models-based learning has been made which provides valuable insights into their strengths and weaknesses. Methods: This randomized parallel group experimental study was conducted on 1st year MBBS students in Department of Anatomy, Gomal Medical College, DI Khan from March to May 2025. Students included were randomly assigned into two different groups. Group A (n=58) were taught using virtual anatomical dissection table, and Group B (n=58) were taught using traditional models. Both groups had no prior experience with anatomical dissection table and anatomical models. At the end of the study the post evaluation test based on MCQs was conducted. Results: The analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the mean post-test scores between the two groups. Students taught using the virtual anatomical dissection table (Group A) achieved significantly higher scores compared to those taught using traditional anatomical models (Group B), (p<0.001), indicating highly significant differences. Conclusion: The teaching methodology utilizing the Anatomage Table is significantly more effective than the traditional methods.

Pak J Physiol;21(4):19–21, DOI: https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v21i4.1865

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Shayr Ali Khan, Student, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan

student MBBS

References

Klettner A, Luo S, Coyle LD, Liu N. A review of the link between psychological stress and inflammatory bowel disease exacerbation. Acad Ment Health Well-Being 2025;2(1):7617.

Almizani MS, Alotaibi MA, Bin Askar MF, Albaqami NM, Alobaishi RS, Arafa MA, et al. Clinicians’ and students’ perceptions and attitudes regarding the anatomical knowledge of medical students. Adv Med Educ Pract 2022;13:1251–9.

Diaz CM, Linden K, Solyali V. Novel and innovative approaches to teaching human anatomy classes in an online environment during a pandemic. Med Sci Educ 2021;31:1703–13.

Pandey SB, Patel BN, Chourasia RS, Kumar R. A comparative study of traditional vs modern anatomy teaching methods on student knowledge retention. Azerbaijan Pharm Pharmacother J 2024;23(2):193–9.

Ghazanfar H, Rashid S, Hussain A, Ghazanfar M, Ghazanfar A, Javaid A. Cadaveric dissection a thing of the past? The insight of consultants, fellows, and residents. Cureus 2018;10(4):e2418.

Zhang L, Xiao M, Gu M, Zhang Y, Jin J, Ding J. An overview of the roles and responsibilities of Chinese medical colleges in body donation programs. Anat Sci Educ 2014;7(4):312–20.

Zhang L, Wang Y, Xiao M, Han Q, Ding J. Ethical solution to the challenges in teaching anatomy with dissection in the Chinese culture. Anat Sci Educ 2008;1(2):56–9.

Atwa H, Dafalla S, Kamal D. Wet specimens, plastinated specimens, or plastic models in learning anatomy: perception of undergraduate medical students. Med Sci Educ 2021;31(4):1479–86.

Kavvadia EM, Katsoula I, Angelis S, Filippou D. The Anatomage Table: a promising alternative in anatomy education. Cureus 2023;15(8):e43047.

Funjan K, Ashour L, Salameh M, Mustafa A, Seed Ahmed M. Perceptions and attitudes of Jordanian medical students on using 3D interactive anatomy dissection in teaching and learning anatomy. Adv Med Educ Pract 2023;14:837–44.

Koney NK, Ansah AO, Asaku BNA, Ahenkorah J, Hottor BA, Adutwum-Ofosu K, et al. Anatomage virtual dissection versus traditional human body dissection in anatomy pedagogy: insights from Ghanaian medical students. BMC Med Educ 2024;24(1):1059.

Anand MK, Singel TC. A comparative study of learning with ‘Anatomage’ virtual dissection table versus traditional dissection method in neuroanatomy. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol 2017;4(2):177–80.

Qureshi F, Waseem U, Tafweez R, Zakia S, Fatima S, Qureshi F. Use of Anatomage virtual dissection table for teaching anatomy in medical college. Pak J Med Health Sci 2022;16(12):53–5.

Tenaw B. Teaching gross anatomy: Anatomage table as an innovative line of attack. Int J Anat Var 2020;13(1):76–9.

Duparc F. 3D-virtual dissection table: we did not imagine how much it will be useful for teaching anatomy and clinical anatomy. Rev Argent Anat Clin 2017;9(1):9.

Kausar T, Chandio S, Quddus I, Qureshi GS, Baloch ZH, Pario A. Effectiveness of teaching with visualisation table in comparison to traditional lecture in Anatomy Department, Jinnah Sindh Medical University. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2020;30(10):1074–7.

Totlis T, Tishukov M, Piagkou M, Kostares M, Natsis K. Online educational methods vs traditional teaching of anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anat Cell Biol 2021;54:332–9.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2025

How to Cite

1.
Aman S, Khan MH, Azeem M, Kundi F, Zaman J, Zahid H, et al. EFFECTIVENESS OF ANATOMICAL DISSECTION TABLE VERSUS TRADITIONAL ANATOMICAL MODELS IN STUDENTS OF GOMAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, DI KHAN. Pak J Phsyiol [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 31 [cited 2026 Jan. 3];21(4):19-21. Available from: https://pjp.pps.org.pk/index.php/PJP/article/view/1865