RECTUS SHEATH SLING PROCEDURE: A NEW HORIZON IN UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE TREATMENT

Authors

  • Sadia Nazir Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, DG Khan Medical College, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
  • Amna Aziz Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan
  • Rashida Parveen Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, DG. Khan Medical College, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
  • Amna Bibi Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan
  • Abdul Rehman Qaisrani Department of Pathology, DG Khan Medical College, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
  • Syeda Hina Fatima Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, DG Khan Medical College, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v21i2.1801

Keywords:

Rectus sheath sling, Uterovaginal descent, Uterovaginal prolapse

Abstract

Background: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy offers a durable solution for pelvic organ prolapse through mesh suspension techniques. This study assessed the outcome of rectus fascial sling procedure. Methods: This single-arm interventional study was done on 50 patients with uterovaginal prolapse, in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, DG Khan Medical College, DG Khan and Nishtar Medical University, Multan. PFDI-20 (Pelvic Floor Disability Index) was measured preoperatively to assess severity of symptoms. Rectus sheath sling procedure was performed. Surgical outcome was measured one year after surgery. Difference in mean PFDI-20 score before and after surgery was calculated. Results: Mean age of the patients was 27.9±11.5 years; 46 (92%) women had 2nd degree uterovaginal descent and 4 (8%) women had 1st degree prolapse. Mean time of operation was <1 hour in 46 (92%) and >1 hour in 4 (8%) of patients. Sixteen (32%) women had hospital stay of 1-2 days after the surgery and 34 (68%) women stayed for 3-4 days in the hospital. Surgical outcome was measured post operatively one year after surgery with PFDI-20. Ninety-two percent women reported no symptoms post procedure. Mean PFDI-20 score after surgery was 11.6±5.61. ?Mean PFDI-20 score was 43.4±9.4 showing substantial improvement in the symptoms after surgery. PFDI-20 score after surgery was found to be significantly associated with age (p<0.001). Conclusion: Rectus sheath sling operation for uterovaginal descent is effective, minimally invasive, and less time consuming. It can be recommended for women desiring to preserve their fertility.

Pak J Physiol 2025;21(2):25-28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v21i2.1801

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Choi KH, Hong JY. Management of pelvic organ prolapse. Korean J Urol 2014;55(11):693–702.

Tso C, Lee W, Austin-Ketch T, Winkler H, Zitkus B. Nonsurgical treatment options for women with pelvic organ prolapse. Nursing Womens Health 2018;22(3):228–39.

Jokhio AH, Rizvi RM, MacArthur C. Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in women, associated factors and impact on quality of life in rural Pakistan: population-based study. BMC Womens Health 2020;20(1):82.

Zulfiqar S, Karim S, Zulfiqar S. Modified sling procedure for treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. J Shaikh Zayed Medical Coll 2018;9(3):1467–9.

Sarwar I, Khan AB, Khurshid W, Islam A, Bibi S. Management of uterine prolapse: vaginal hysterectomy versus uterus preserving procedures. J Rehman Med Inst 2023;9(2):10–3.

Rameshkumar R, Kamat L, Tungal S, Moni S. Modified purandare’s cervicopexy—a conservative surgery for genital prolapse: a retrospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017;6(5):1777–81.

Lin FC, Gilleran JP, Powell CR, Atiemo HO. To mesh or not mesh ‘apical prolapse’, that is the question! Neurourol Urodyn 2024;43(7):1626–30.

Banu LF. Synthetic sling for genital prolapse in young women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;57(1):57–64.

Dietz V, Schraffordt Koops SE, van der Vaart CH. Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20(3):349–56.

Rahat-un-Nisa, Parveen Z. Abdominal suspension operation for utero-vaginal prolapse using autologous facial sling of rectus sheath. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2000;12(3):29–30.

Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Funk MJ. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123(6):1201–6.

Gutman R, Maher C. Uterine-preserving POP surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1803–13.

Roovers JP, van der Vaart CH, van der Bom JG, van Leeuwen JH, Scholten PC, Heintz AP. A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function. BJOG 2004;111(1):50–6.

Khan NA, Fayyaz A, Iqbal R, Attaullah H. Abdominal suspension operation for uterovaginal roll strip of rectus sheath as sling. Pak J Med Health Sci 2020;14(3):714–5.

Abid S, Ashraf A. Effectiveness of autologous rectus sheath sling abdominal procedure for utero-vaginal prolapse. J Akhtar Saeed Med Dent Coll 2023;5(3):125–30.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

1.
Nazir S, Aziz A, Parveen R, Bibi A, Qaisrani AR, Fatima SH. RECTUS SHEATH SLING PROCEDURE: A NEW HORIZON IN UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE TREATMENT. Pak J Phsyiol [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 30 [cited 2025 Sep. 21];21(2):25-8. Available from: https://pjp.pps.org.pk/index.php/PJP/article/view/1801