A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF NON-OPERATIVE AND OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF HUMERUS MID-SHAFT FRACTURESA PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF NON-OPERATIVE AND OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF HUMERUS MID-SHAFT FRACTURES

Authors

  • Masel Khan Department of Orthopedics, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Basharat Department of Orthopedics, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Faheem Sabir Department of Orthopedics, Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Usama Department of Orthopedics, Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Naveed Department of Orthopedics, Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Babar Shahzad Sadiq Department of Orthopedics, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Ali Usman Department of Orthopedics, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v21i2.1726

Keywords:

High energy trauma, Humerus fracture, Internal fixation, Non-operative technique, Open reduction

Abstract

Background: Humerus shaft fractures are common long bone fractures and the treatment options range from conventional plaster application to plate osteosynthesis. This study aimed to determine outcomes of non-operative vs operative techniques in managing mid-shaft humerus fractures. Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted in Department of Orthopaedics, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, from 10 Oct 2022 to 9 Apr 2023. Patients aged 20–70 years with unilateral, displaced, and closed humeral shaft fracture were included using non-probability consecutive sampling, after approval of hospital ethical committee and written informed consent of patients. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in group A were treated with operative technique and patients in group B were treated with non-operative technique. Outcomes were observed on 12 weeks’ follow-up. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS-22. Results: One-hundred-fifty patients were enrolled, 75 patients in each group. Mean age was 43.75±14.7 years in group A and 40.64±14.9 years in group B. There were 58.7% males in group A and 61.3% in group B. Females were 41.3% in group A and 38.7% in group B. In group A non-union was present in 5.3%, malunion in 10%, and radial nerve injury in 5.3% patients. In group B non-union was present in 17.3%, malunion in 26.7% and radial nerve injury in 21.3% patients. All these showed statistically significant difference with p-value 0.020, 0.041 and 0.004 respectively. Conclusion: Operative technique is better than non-operative technique in management of mid-shaft humerus fracture.

Pak J Physiol 2025;21(2):34-37, DOI: https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v21i2.1726

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Naclerio E, McKee M. Approach to humeral shaft nonunion: evaluation and surgical techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022;30(2):50–9.

Oliver WM, Molyneux SG, White TO, Clement ND, Duckworth AD. Routine fixation of humeral shaft fractures is cost-effective: cost-utility analysis of 215 patients at a mean of five years following nonoperative management. Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):566–72.

Rämö L, Sumrein BO, Lepola V, Lähdeoja T, Ranstam J, Paavola M. Effect of surgery vs functional bracing on functional outcome among patients with closed displaced humeral shaft fractures: The FISH randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020;323(18):1792–801.

Gallusser N, Barimani B, Vauclair F. Humeral shaft fractures. EFORT Open Rev 2021;6(1):24–34.

Patino JM, Ramella JC, Michelini AE, Abdon IM, Rodriguez EF, Corna AFR. Plates vs nails in humeral shaft fractures: Do plates lead to a better shoulder function? JSES Int 2021;5(4):765–8.

Hu Y, Wu T, Li B, Huang Y, Huang C, Luo Y. Efficacy and safety evaluation of intramedullary nail and locking compression plate in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput Math Methods Med 2022;2022:5759233.

Wen H, Zhu S, Li C, Chen Z, Yang H, Xu Y. Antegrade intramedullary nail versus plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: An update meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98(46):e17952.

Denard A Jr, Richards JE, Obremskey WT, Tucker MC, Floyd M, Herzog GA. Outcome of nonoperative vs operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: A retrospective study of 213 patients. Orthopedics 2010;33(8).

Shields E, Sundem L, Childs S, Maceroli M, Humphrey C, Ketz JP, et al. The impact of residual angulation on patient reported functional outcome scores after non-operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures. Injury 2016;47(4):914–8.

Papasoulis E, Drosos GI, Ververidis AN, Verettas DA. Functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures: a review of clinical studies. Injury 2010;41(7):e21–7.

Ali E, Griffiths D, Obi N, Tytherleigh-Strong G, Van Rensburg L. Nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures revisited. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24(2):210–4.

Singisetti K, Ambedkar M. Nailing versus plating in humerus shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study. Int Orthop 2010;34(4):571–6.

Hee HT, Low BY, See HF. Surgical results of open reduction and plating of humeral shaft fractures. Ann Acad Med Singap 1998;27(6):772–5.

Streufert BD, Eaford I, Sellers TR, Christensen JT, Maxson B, Infante A, et al. Iatrogenic nerve palsy occurs with anterior and posterior approaches for humeral shaft fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2020;34(3):163–8.

Sargeant HW, Farrow L, Barker S, Kumar K. Operative versus non-operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: A systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 2020;12(4):229–42.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

1.
Khan M, Basharat M, Sabir F, Usama M, Naveed M, Sadiq BS, et al. A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF NON-OPERATIVE AND OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF HUMERUS MID-SHAFT FRACTURESA PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF NON-OPERATIVE AND OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF HUMERUS MID-SHAFT FRACTURES. Pak J Phsyiol [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 30 [cited 2025 Sep. 21];21(2):34-7. Available from: https://pjp.pps.org.pk/index.php/PJP/article/view/1726