DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PERIANAL FISTULAE AND ABSCESSES

Authors

  • Fakiha Zabit Department of Radiology, Fazaia Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Sadaf Fasih Department of Dermatology, Abu Umara Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Asad Bilal Arif Department of Surgery, M. Islam Medical College, Gujranwala, Pakistan
  • Omair Ahmed Zahoor Department of Surgery, PAF Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Rimsha Khan Department of Radiology, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Aamna Naeem Department of Dermatology, Abu Umara Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v20i4.1552

Keywords:

diagnostic accuracy., magnetic resonance imaging., perianal fistulae., abscesses., surgical findings.

Abstract

Background: Perianal fistulae and abscesses are the different manifestations of the same clinical disease. They have been afflicting humans since ages. Although the disease is benign, it still adversely affects the patient’s quality of life. Up to 38% fistulae in ano arise from perianal abscesses. This study is aimed at determining the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano and perianal abscess, taking surgical confirmation as gold standard for the diagnosis. Methods: This cross-sectional validation study was conducted at Department of Radiology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, over a period of 6 months. In this study a total of 121 patients were enrolled using WHO software for sample size determination and by consecutive sampling (non-probability) technique. Results: The mean age of the patients was 43±12.77 years. Sixty-eight percent patients were male while 32% patients were female. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for perianal fistula assessment was 95.04%, Sensitivity 95.72%, Specificity 75%, Positive predictive value 99.11%, and Negative predictive value was 37.50%. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI of abscess on the basis of surgical findings turned out to be 90.08%, Sensitivity 91.45%, Specificity 50%, Positive predictive value 98.16%, and Negative predictive value 16.66%. Conclusion: MRI is quite an accurate, non-invasive imaging technique for determination of type and extent of peri-anal fistula and abscess.

Pak J Physiol 2024;20(4):65-7, DOI: https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v20i4.1552

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zubaidi AM. Anal fistula. Past and present. Saudi Med J 2014;35(9):937–44.

Slauf P, Anto? F, Marx J. [Acute periproctal abscesses]. Rozhl Chir 2014;93(4):226–31. [Article in Czech]

Ramanujam PS, Prasad ML, Abcarian H, Tan AB. Perianal abscesses and fistulae. A study of 1023 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27(9):593–7.

Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH. The incidence of recurrent abscesses or fistula-in-ano following anorectal suppuration. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27(2):126–30.

Lee EH, Yang HR, Kim JY. Comparison of transperianal ultrasound with colonoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging in perianal Crohn’s disease. J Pediatr Gasteroenterol Nutr 2018;66(4):614–9.

Sofic A, Beslic S, Sehovic N, Caluk J, Sofic D. MRI in evaluation of perianal fistulae. Radiol Oncol 2010;44(4):220–7.

Algazzar HY, Eldib DK, Bahram MA, Zaher NA. Preoperative MRI of perianal fistula evaluation and its impact on surgical outcome. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2019;50:71.

Agha ME, Eid M, Mansy H, Matarawy K, Wally M. Preoperative MRI of perianal fistula: Is it really indispensable? Can it be deceptive? Alexndria J Med 2013;49(2):133–44.

Karanikas I, Koutserimpas C, Siaperas P, Skarpas A, Karoubalis J, Velimezis G. Transrectal ultrasonography of perianal fistulas: a single center experience from a surgeon’s point of view. G Chir 2018;39(4):258–60.

Adityan R, Immanuel JP. The role of diagnostic medical imaging techniques in the evaluation of peri-anal fistula: A review. Int J Radiol Imaging Technol 2021;7(2):1510084.

Siddiqui MR, Ashrafian H, Tozer P, Daulatzai N, Burling D, Hart A, et al. A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55:576–85.

Li X, Qiang JW, He C, Ji XS, Zhang B. Magnetic resonance imaging study of perianal abscess. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2011;14:868–70.

Singh K, Singh N, Thukral C, Singh KP, Bhalla V. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of perianal fistulae with surgical correlation. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(6):RC01–4.

Imaad ur Rehman, Akhtar S, Rana A, Latif U, Saleem H, Chaudhary MY. MRI in the pre-operative evaluation of perianal fistula. J Postgrad Med Inst 2014;28(3) 264–9.

Barker PG, Lunniss PJ, Armstrong P, Reznek RH, Cottam K, Phillips RK. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano: technique, interpretation and accuracy. Clin Radiol 1994;49:7–13.

Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano. Radiology 2006;239(1):18–33.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2024

How to Cite

1.
Zabit F, Fasih S, Arif AB, Zahoor OA, Khan R, Naeem A. DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PERIANAL FISTULAE AND ABSCESSES. Pak J Phsyiol [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 31 [cited 2025 Feb. 5];20(4):65-7. Available from: https://pjp.pps.org.pk/index.php/PJP/article/view/1552