COMPARISON BETWEEN ONLINE AND ON CAMPUS CBL SESSIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF STUDENTS IN HITEC-IMS, TAXILA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69656/pjp.v18i3.1481Keywords:
CBL, Online format, On-campus format, Medical educationAbstract
Background: Medical colleges and educational institutions around the world underwent a major shift of teaching methodology from regular classroom environments to virtual classrooms during the COVID-19 pandemic. While many instructional methodologies were easily conducted in both formats, interactive activities requiring group participation like CBLs presented a big challenge. The objective of this study was to compare Online and On-campus formats of CBL sessions through students’ feedback and identify the areas in both formats that require amelioration. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted at HITEC-IMS, Taxila including 185 students from 1st year and 2nd year MBBS who had attended at least 4 CBL sessions online and on campus formats. The questionnaire comprised of statements evaluating 5 major constructs: Acquisition of knowledge (AK), Critical thinking (CT), Communication skills (CSKILL), Presentation skills (PS), and Physical Environment (PE). Responses were assessed on a 5-points Likert scale. Data was analysed on SPSS-28. The two formats were compared using Chi-square test, and p?0.05 was considered significant. Results: Responses for acquisition of knowledge (74.6% vs 69.2%) and critical thinking (75% vs 70%) were comparable for both formats while online format was lacking in attainment of communication skills (67% vs 80%) and presentation skills (56.8% vs 71.4%). Conclusion: Respondents perceived On-campus format as a better option for conduction of CBL.
Pak J Physiol 2022;18(3):39?43
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Pakistan Journal of Physiology, Pak J Physiol, PJP is FREE for research and academic purposes. It can be freely downloaded and stored, printed, presented, projected, cited and quoted with full reference of, and acknowledgement to the author(s) and the PJP. The contents are published with an international CC-BY-ND-4.0 License.