• Rabia Siddiqui Department of Physiology, Bahria University Medical and Dental College, Karachi
  • Nighat Mannan Department of Physiology, Bahria University Medical and Dental College, Karachi
  • Fatima Mannan Department of Physiology, Bahria University Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan


Background: A powerful way of improving one’s memory for study material is to be tested on that material. Frequent testing in the classroom may boost educational achievement at all levels of education. Repetitive evaluation of subject matter is called ‘frequent testing’. Methods: Data on perceptions of frequent assessment were collected from students of all five years of BUMDC, Karachi with a questionnaire. The 14 item questionnaire was clustered around 8 variables: the purpose, test content and objectives, timing, feedback on assessment, the assessor, frequent exams, understanding of curriculum, and test taking strategies. A 3 point itemized rating scale of ‘Yes’, ‘No’ and ‘Not sure’ was used for collecting responses. Students of all 5 years of MBBS of BUMDC were given the questionnaire forms and asked to complete them. Results: The study population consisted of 213 (64%) females and 120 (36%) males. Their mean age was 20±8 years. The most frequently endorsed purpose of assessment, as perceived by students was to achieve high grades. A second important purpose was motivation for learning. Conclusion: The underlying values of all these points are important to teachers and students seeking better ways to teach and learn. Frequent testing will enhance learning and studying habits, while increasing recall and the depth of knowledge learned.

Keywords: Student, testing, questionnaire, examination, assessment, education, perception

Pak J Physiol 2017;13(2):46–8


1. Poljicanin A, Carić A, Vilović K, Kosta V, Marinović Guić M, Aljinović J, et al. Daily mini quizzes as a means of improving student performance in Anatomy course. Croat Med J 2009;50(1):55–60.
2. Kling N, McCorke D, Miller C, Reardon J. The impact of testing frequency on student performance in a marketing course. J Educ Bus 2005;81(2):67–72.
3. Kuo T, Simon A. How many tests do we really need? Coll Teach 2009;57(3):156–60.
4. Crooks TJ. The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students, Rev Educ Res 1988;58(4):438–81.
5. Robert L. Bangert-Drowns, Kulik JA, Kulik CC. Effects of frequent classroom testing. J Educ Res 1991;85(2):89–99.
6. Jones HE. Experimental Studies of College Teaching: The effect of examination on permanence of learning. Science Press; 1923.
7. Absolum M. Clarity in the classroom: Using Formative Assessment. Auckland, New Zealand: Hachette Livre; 2006.
8. Leahy S, Lyon C, Thompson M, William D. Classroom Assessment: minute by minute, day by day. Educ Leader 2005;63(3):19–24.
9. McTighe J, O’Conner K. Seven practices for effective learning. Educ Leader 2005;63(3):10–17.
10. Graham S, Donaldson J. Adult student’s academic and intellectual development in college. Adult Educ Quarter 1999;49(3):147–61.
11. Pikunas J, Mazzota D. The effects of weekly testing in the teaching of science. Sci Educ 1965;49:373–6.
12. Rodriguez MC. The role of classroom assessment in student performance on TIMSS. Appl Measure Educ 2004;17(1):1–24.
13. Glasson T. Improving student achievement: a practical guide to assessment for learning. Carlton South, Vic: Curriculum Corporation; 2009. 139 p.
14. Black P, Harrison C, Lee C, Marshall B, Wiliam D. Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom. Phi Delta Kappan 2004;86(1):8–21.
15. Marton F, Saljo R. In: Marton F, Hounsell DJ, Eintwistle NJ, (Eds). The Experience of Learning. (2nd ed) Edinburg: Scottish Academic Press; 1997.
16. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL 3rd. Test enhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ 2008;42:959–65.
17. Karpicke JD, Roediger HL 3rd. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science 2008;319:966–8.
18. Leeming FC. Exam a day procedure improves performance in psychology classes. Teach Psychol 2002;29:210–2.
19. Stiggins R. Assessment through the Student’s Eyes. Educ Leader 2007;64(8):22–6.
20. Thirey B. Student perceptions regarding effectiveness of daily quizzes in collegiate level Calculus. Center for Teaching Excellence, United States Military, Academy, West Point, NY, 2011.
21. Rieth H, Axelrod S, Anderson R, Hathaway F, Wood K, Fitzgerald C. Influence of distributed practice and daily testing on weekly spelling tests. J Educ Res 1974;68(2):73–7.
22. Keys N. The influence of learning of retention of weekly as opposed to monthly tests. J Educ Psychol 1934;25:427–36.
23. Graham RB. Unannounced quizzes raises test scores selectively for midrange students. Teach Psychol 1999;26:271–3.
24. Karpicke JD, Roediger HL 3rd. Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. J Mem Lang 2007;57:151–62.
25. McDaniel MA, Anderson JL, Derbish MH, Morrisette N. Testing the testing effect in the classroom. Eur J Cogn Psychol 2007;19(4-5):494–513.
26. Wolf PJ. Academic improvement through regular assessment. Peabody J Educ 2007;82:690–702.
27. Stiggins R, Chappuis J. Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory Pract 2005;44:11–8.
How to Cite
SIDDIQUI, Rabia; MANNAN, Nighat; MANNAN, Fatima. STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ABOUT FREQUENT EXAMINATIONS. Pakistan Journal of Physiology, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 46-48, june 2017. ISSN 2073-1183. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 22 jan. 2018.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.